Ruger VT's

Talk about your Varmint Rifles and other firearms here!
17MachIV
New Member
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:07 pm
Favourite Cartridge: .308
Location: Merriwa, NSW

Ruger VT's

Post by 17MachIV »

OK everyone I have talked to has been happy with the accuracy of their VT's. So is there anyone here that has owned one that hasn't shot well. I am after varminting accuracy not the next world benchrest record.

Thanks
Steve
adamjp
.270 Winchester
Posts: 1293
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:01 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 30/06
Location: Sthn NSW

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by adamjp »

Likely to be a short and silent thread.
User avatar
MISSED
Moderator
Posts: 8377
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:23 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 20 PPC
Location: YASS

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by MISSED »

I am with Adam on this,I can hear trhe crickets tuning up
Con
.308 Winchester
Posts: 1515
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:10 am

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by Con »

Okay ... I'll fess up that I had a VT that "wouldn't shoot". I bought it S/H, cleaned the crap out of it, mounted a Leupold 12x40AO and was dissappointed with 1.25MOA groups ... but they were nice and round. Tried a few styles of factory ammunition (non-premium) and Norinco military with projectiles pulled and refitted with 50gr BlitzKings and nothing really tightened it up. I finally got a bit frustrated and bought a set of Lee RGB dies and threw together a 'real' load using the 52gr Sierra MK projectile and voila! Sub-MOA !!

I sold it as it was a bit too heavy for what I wanted at the time, but before selling I sighted it in with an ADI 'Feral Buster' load ... it was the first factory load that cracked sub-MOA.

Would I buy another VT ... sure would! But I'd no longer keep them standard ... I'd rechamber to 284 based cartridges as the Ruger action feeds and functions perfectly with them.
Cheers...
Con
Brad Y
.338 Lapua Magnum
Posts: 3256
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:47 pm
Favourite Cartridge: N/A
Location: Im here...

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by Brad Y »

Not a VT but had a 77/22 hornet that wasnt great.

Mates VT shoots well, but the triggers are shocking. Ones ive mounted in the shops dont look great- seems the lines on the actions arent very square and i usually have to put aftermarket rings on them as the ones supplied in the box arent that crash hot.

But yes I cant fault the way they shoot.

Rugers and 284's eh... I was thinking of a straight 284, but it would probably be a target/long range rig so I dare say would stay with remmy or something like that.
User avatar
MISSED
Moderator
Posts: 8377
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:23 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 20 PPC
Location: YASS

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by MISSED »

Strange you say that about the mounts Brad I have had three M77`s and still have one.I have always used Ruger rings and have yet to have any alignment dramas,scope ring marks or mounts coming loose.I have more than once read of the inherant strength of the Ruger mounting system.I will agree with you on the M77 mk11`s trigger.It is woefull but that said it can be worked on.The VT has a different trigger in that it is 2 a stage and the ones I have shot have broken nicely but are a bit heavy.
You are not trying to drum up a bit of extra sales in the shop are you
270
New Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:33 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 270

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by 270 »

Brad Y wrote:Not a VT but had a 77/22 hornet that wasnt great.
Ones ive mounted in the shops dont look great- seems the lines on the actions arent very square and i usually have to put aftermarket rings on them as the ones supplied in the box arent that crash hot.
It sounds like a poor workman blaming the tools, I tend to disagree with a lot of the stuff that you have written on this forum.
User avatar
kjd
Site Admin
Posts: 4424
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:27 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 223Rem
Location: Picton
Contact:

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by kjd »

I've seen my fair share of ruger vt's and owned one and I have to say they are brilliant every one of them has shot great! Triggers an easy fix and not a reason not to buy one!
Brad Y
.338 Lapua Magnum
Posts: 3256
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:47 pm
Favourite Cartridge: N/A
Location: Im here...

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by Brad Y »

270 wrote:
Brad Y wrote:Not a VT but had a 77/22 hornet that wasnt great.
Ones ive mounted in the shops dont look great- seems the lines on the actions arent very square and i usually have to put aftermarket rings on them as the ones supplied in the box arent that crash hot.
It sounds like a poor workman blaming the tools, I tend to disagree with a lot of the stuff that you have written on this forum.
Thats your opinion, thats fine. There are plenty of riflemakers that really dont make rifles as good as they claim to be. Sure you cant get things perfect on a manufacturing line so we choose to just use what works and stick with it. Or we build rifles to how we want if we arent happy with what is on offer. I wasnt saying that ruger rifles are crap, but taking a good hard look at them, they seem no different than other rifles. I will also tell you that remington have pretty poor quality control- with firing pins, bolt heads and barrels having issues on occasion. Savage F class rifles are starting to have some quality issues as well with long throats, crooked chambers and, as Trevor T has indicated on the savag etarget action, trigger problems. But you can get perfectly good rifles from each manufacturer as well. FYI Im not a gunsmith, Im a project manager for an multi million dollar company, but I get to help out in the shop as often as I get the time. That means I see and hear good and bad things a fair bit from the proper gunsmiths that have alot more experience than most. I also keep a keen eye on the rifles moving in and out of the store so I can see what they look and function like.... So no Im not an expert. I wont waste your time by writing anything else you disagree with. Apologies for the inconvenience.
Brad Y
.338 Lapua Magnum
Posts: 3256
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:47 pm
Favourite Cartridge: N/A
Location: Im here...

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by Brad Y »

kjd wrote:I've seen my fair share of ruger vt's and owned one and I have to say they are brilliant every one of them has shot great! Triggers an easy fix and not a reason not to buy one!

Definitely not mate, I agree if your on a good thing stick to it. There are plenty of pro cullers around that use them and swear by them too. A mate who is on this site, has a VT in 22-250 and that drives nails. Timney and rifle basix make good triggers are worthwhile investments. I have one in my howa as that trigger was pretty average on that too.
User avatar
kjd
Site Admin
Posts: 4424
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:27 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 223Rem
Location: Picton
Contact:

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by kjd »

Yeah well their two stage triggers IMO are good but have been made heavy at request of lawyers but they are crisp and really one of the best on a stock rifle. No need for an aftermarket trigger really.

Just gotta ask though what relevance is it that you work for a multi million dollar company? Is it firearm related? Just that most people work for multi million dollar companies and I'm wondering the relevance of what you were saying?
User avatar
Dr G
300 Win Mag
Posts: 1841
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:52 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 204 Ruger
Location: Not in Roxby Downs, SA

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by Dr G »

17MachIV wrote:OK everyone I have talked to has been happy with the accuracy of their VT's. So is there anyone here that has owned one that hasn't shot well. I am after varminting accuracy not the next world benchrest record.

Thanks
Steve
G'Day Steve

I bought a semi customised Ruger VT off of some bloke who occasionally turns up here at AV. The bloody thing is a compleate dissapointment let me tell you :wink: . It only puts five shots consistently into about .9 of an inch at 100yards with factory ammo. I mean .9 jeez, based on all the advertising hype around many factory rifles this is barely adequete :roll:

It is a great rifle mate I am looking forwards to developing its potential with some handloads. The bloke who sold it to me reckons he was getting just on or over moa with it but having put a few rounds through it with cheap arsed winchester softpoints i reckon his load development was off or he is a shit shot :D

Dr G
User avatar
kjd
Site Admin
Posts: 4424
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:27 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 223Rem
Location: Picton
Contact:

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by kjd »

Dr G wrote:
17MachIV wrote:OK everyone I have talked to has been happy with the accuracy of their VT's. So is there anyone here that has owned one that hasn't shot well. I am after varminting accuracy not the next world benchrest record.

Thanks
Steve
G'Day Steve

I bought a semi customised Ruger VT off of some bloke who occasionally turns up here at AV. The bloody thing is a compleate dissapointment let me tell you :wink: . It only puts five shots consistently into about .9 of an inch at 100yards with factory ammo. I mean .9 jeez, based on all the advertising hype around many factory rifles this is barely adequete :roll:

It is a great rifle mate I am looking forwards to developing its potential with some handloads. The bloke who sold it to me reckons he was getting just on or over moa with it but having put a few rounds through it with cheap arsed winchester softpoints i reckon his load development was off or he is a shit shot :D

Dr G
Its far more capable then MOA mate. I had a trip planned with it but it fell through so I rushed load dev and got MOA with most loads and I was only needing MOA so I didn't bother doing any more load dev. I reckon with some 140 BT's or something along those lines it will be singing. It did pretty good with the 120gn Vmax and once again it was a rushed load. I reckon with a bit of fiddling .75moa is a given.
User avatar
kjd
Site Admin
Posts: 4424
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:27 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 223Rem
Location: Picton
Contact:

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by kjd »

oh and I am a shit shot hahahahaha
User avatar
trevort
Spud Gun
Posts: 12710
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:21 pm
Favourite Cartridge: Tater
Location: Melbourne

Re: Ruger VT's

Post by trevort »

I had one in 204 ruger. I wanted a varmint weight rifle with 26 inch barrel and there werent very many companies chambering for the 'new' 204 ruger way back then.

I thought it was ugly but it fitted my criteria and was what I could afford.

It shot like stink. Like really really good. A gunsmith who had a business in Ballarat looked down the tube with a borescope and told me I had a really good barrel and looked at my targets and told me not to mess with its bedding or trigger.

Yeah, that rifle hooked me into the accuracy bug and love of guns that has since cost me thousands of dollars.

Wouldnt hesitate to recommend one, beauty is in the eye of the beholder!!!
Post Reply