Does the .223 give to much away to the .204?
-
- .223 Remington
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:48 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: spud gun!!!
- Location: Hunter Valley
Its like you said Trev, depends on what your shooting. People bag the 204 because of the on going roo shooting debate.
I read somewhere the 204 is kinder on its barrel throat too (less powder).
My old man recently got a 204 and he loves it.
I think it is true that if you do buy one your fully converted.
I read somewhere the 204 is kinder on its barrel throat too (less powder).
My old man recently got a 204 and he loves it.
I think it is true that if you do buy one your fully converted.
-
- .22 WMR
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:57 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: 17-223 Mudgegonga
- Location: Yarra Valley
-
- .22 WMR
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:57 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: 17-223 Mudgegonga
- Location: Yarra Valley
- Drew Jaeger
- .223 Remington
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:36 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: 7mm-08
- Location: Southern Tablelands, NSW
Having owned and operated a 204, 223 and 22-250, I can say IMO the 204 with 39gr BKs is the pick of the three. I have provided ballistic details on this site in another topic comparing the 204 and 22-250.jb747 wrote:Do you own them both?kjd wrote:Buy the 223 mate the 204 is overrated...
Each to their own.
I knew you would be in on this when i saw you were back, Good to see you again drew.Drew Jaeger wrote:Having owned and operated a 204, 223 and 22-250, I can say IMO the 204 with 39gr BKs is the pick of the three. I have provided ballistic details on this site in another topic comparing the 204 and 22-250.jb747 wrote:Do you own them both?kjd wrote:Buy the 223 mate the 204 is overrated...
Each to their own.
That was why I commented the way I did. The person stating that the 204 was overrated struck me as someone who simply hasn't used one, and certainly has never owned one.
When we first bought a 204, we owned a 22/250, 6/250, a couple of 223s and a 222RM. Both /250s have been sold and one of the 223s is gone (the other is more a collectors item anyway). The ballistics of the 204 match the 22/250, with a lot less fuss. The 39 gr Sierra is deadly on small game, and out to well beyond the normal reach of a 223.
Right now, we have a second 204 being built, and our remaining .224 will be rebarrelled to some form of 20 cal as next years project.
Obviously they aren't legal for roo shooting, but if you're simply after a rabbit/fox/cat rifle, out to about 400 metres, the 204s are superb.
When we first bought a 204, we owned a 22/250, 6/250, a couple of 223s and a 222RM. Both /250s have been sold and one of the 223s is gone (the other is more a collectors item anyway). The ballistics of the 204 match the 22/250, with a lot less fuss. The 39 gr Sierra is deadly on small game, and out to well beyond the normal reach of a 223.
Right now, we have a second 204 being built, and our remaining .224 will be rebarrelled to some form of 20 cal as next years project.
Obviously they aren't legal for roo shooting, but if you're simply after a rabbit/fox/cat rifle, out to about 400 metres, the 204s are superb.
G'Day RinsoRinso wrote:humma,
The perfect solution IMHO well done.
I will expect to see pics when you get it all together.
What sort of scope and mounts are you looking at using ???
cheers
Rinso
I am looking at the Weaver V Series 6-24X42 Varminter reticle. Dont know what mounts at this stage.....open to suggestions.
Cheers
Humma