AR2209 or H4350
AR2213sc or H4831sc
Because you get to different results?
Has anybody had this issue?
Quickload
-
17remfreck
- New Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:13 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: 17fb/6x47lapua
- Location: wallacia
Quickload
In quickload in the propellant table which powder is more correct to ADI2209 and ADI2213sc ?
AR2209 or H4350
AR2213sc or H4831sc
Because you get to different results?
Has anybody had this issue?
AR2209 or H4350
AR2213sc or H4831sc
Because you get to different results?
Has anybody had this issue?
-
RDavies
- .257 Roberts
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 9:43 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: 7 SAUM
- Location: Singleton, Hunter Valley, NSW
Re: Quickload
Yes, I often get 2 different results and both are right enough.
Reason is, different batches can act like either, or even further apart than the samples tested. I have run quickload on about 20 of my barrels and it is very rare that a powder burn rate lines up very close to what I get. Some batches are much faster or slower than others and you need to change a few inputs (burn rate, bullet weight, shot start pressure, internal volume) to get your velocities to line up with the quickload prediction.
Reason is, different batches can act like either, or even further apart than the samples tested. I have run quickload on about 20 of my barrels and it is very rare that a powder burn rate lines up very close to what I get. Some batches are much faster or slower than others and you need to change a few inputs (burn rate, bullet weight, shot start pressure, internal volume) to get your velocities to line up with the quickload prediction.