Surprising result from cheap rangefinder

Scopes, Range finders, Binoculars, Bipods etc etc. Discuss them all here!
Post Reply
bushchook
.223 Remington
Posts: 420
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:23 pm
Favourite Cartridge: .220 Swift
Location: Wheatbelt W.A.

Surprising result from cheap rangefinder

Post by bushchook »

A dealer friend of mine brought a $500 Bushnell Legend rangefinder with him on a shooting trip last weekend . Had a chance to compare side by side with a $1500 Swarovski .
Bushnell is rated to 930 yards on reflective targets and 450 on deer . Tried it on a rocky breakaway at 780 metres . No worries .
Ranged a few goats at 330 yards . All above in bright sunlight which is apparently more difficult . Worked OK at night with the spotlight too . It would easily range tree foliage and small saltbushes out to 600 yards plus . Interesting that I couldn't get a reading on a small shed at 600 where the Swaro could . I could however get a reading on the tree next to the shed but the Swaro couldn't ! More trees in the field than sheds in my hunting grounds .
Optics were surprisingly crisp for a cheap Chinese unit but didn't test in poor light . Has 6 x magnification .
Readout and aiming was easier with the Bushnell than with the Swarovski . Swaro does have a lit readout which should be easier to read in low light . Eye must be in EXACTLY the right position though or you can't read the Swaro at all .
I liked the vertical orientation of the Bushnell vs the horizontal of the Swaro too . Easier to aim with one hand .
The Bushnell seemed pretty user friendly overall with a choice of readout in yards or metres . Had a feature that cut out readings under 150 yards for use in brush . Also has scan mode for moving targets .
I'm tempted to buy one as I think it would do 95% of what I would want to do just as well as the Swaro .
Last edited by bushchook on Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Dr G
300 Win Mag
Posts: 1841
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:52 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 204 Ruger
Location: Not in Roxby Downs, SA

Post by Dr G »

sounds good, and with a $1000 saving as well. If your in the market for one go for it.
User avatar
17hmr
.243 Winchester
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: ACT

Post by 17hmr »

thanks for that report, was looking into getting that range finder soon(bushnell)
User avatar
Dave.223
.220 Swift
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:22 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 6mmBR
Location: Melbourne

Post by Dave.223 »

I have used a Bushnell rangefinder too and I thought it was great. From memory it was worth around $750. If I was thinking of buying one then Bushnell would be up there.
Jethro
.17 HMR
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:41 pm
Location: N,East Vic

Post by Jethro »

I think Ive just decided on my next bit of retail therapy. The Optic Zone has a special on Bushnell range finders at the moment. 8)
Cheers Jethro :wink:
prodj1000@hotmail.com

Post by prodj1000@hotmail.com »

i wonder how the bushnell1500 goes
Vortex AU

Rangefinders

Post by Vortex AU »

I have used both Bushnell and Nikon and find that I prefer the Nikon - Much longer battery life for a start.
diamond T

Post by diamond T »

Have ordered a bushnell scout 1000 camo with ARC from opticzone, should be here this week. Will try it out & let you know what its like, will be interesting to see how useful the bullet drop setting is, that is you select a code from a chart that suits your caliber, bullet & speed, it then tells you the bullet drop at that particuler range, allowing for angle of terrian.
jonutarr

Post by jonutarr »

Legend scopes are also excellent value
Werribee

Post by Werribee »

I have one of the new Leupold range. It is about 3rd up on the tree.

Only reason I purchased it , and not based model , was that it has an
"inclometer" , ajdusts holdover for shooting up and down hills.

As some of where I shoot is very hill, well to me at least, this was a real +.

However, it is such a complicated, though no doubt capable device, that it is very difficult to use.

Think will give to my sons to work out in their usual ten mins.

Do any of the Bushnells come with the ability to measure drop off etc and are they pretty easy to use.

Others have said how overly complex the Leupold rangefinder I have is.
User avatar
300RUM
.22 WMR
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:25 pm
Location: Mountins
Contact:

Post by 300RUM »

I just picked up a 500yard Bushnell job from cashies. They thought they were binoculars. Got it for 130 bux. Pretty happy with that. Only started looking after a mate on here picked a 400yard bushnell set from cashies for I think 150bux.
User avatar
Dr G
300 Win Mag
Posts: 1841
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:52 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 204 Ruger
Location: Not in Roxby Downs, SA

Post by Dr G »

300RUM wrote:I just picked up a 500yard Bushnell job from cashies. They thought they were binoculars. Got it for 130 bux. Pretty happy with that. Only started looking after a mate on here picked a 400yard bushnell set from cashies for I think 150bux.
Great stuff. Cashies are the biggest bunch of shonky bastards its nice to hear about them stuffing up for a change. 8)

I hope the poor bugger that had them stolen was insured though.
User avatar
300RUM
.22 WMR
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:25 pm
Location: Mountins
Contact:

Post by 300RUM »

Yeah I thought the same thing about them being stolen. Both mine and my mates suprisingly still have their serials No.s attached though.
Not that that means too much. But in QLD the serial No.s are run through the coppers data base of stolen crap.
bushchook
.223 Remington
Posts: 420
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:23 pm
Favourite Cartridge: .220 Swift
Location: Wheatbelt W.A.

Post by bushchook »

Ended up buying the Legend Yardage Pro that I reviewed above .
Took it out yesterday and at about 7.30 P.M. (WDST) I ranged a few trees out to 1044 yards (read 044 yards as display only has 3 digits) and a crow sitting in an otherwise open stubble paddock at 370 yards . A few rabbits in the open at 230 yards . No support for the rangefinder , just offhand .
Not bad for a cheapie I reckon . Really bright sunlight knocks around the performance but I guess we hunt mainly in low light .
Post Reply