spotting scopes ?

deadkelly · Post by **deadkelly** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:49 pm

g'day all ! i'm wanting a spotting scope mainly for range use . i'll be using a 243 win for long range practice & target work . i know it will be a hard feat seeing 6mm holes in paper at 500 m & beyond . can it be done for under $500 ? i almost spend $300 today on a redfield 20-60x60 but thought i'd ask on here first .
btw i need a target / varmint scope for starters ( i'm using a cheap 3x9x40 for now ) i'm on a very tight budget for now . i have seen some scopes on line i think they were called muller or something similar , they seemed very reasonably priced . $500 would be my limit .

chappo555 · Post by **chappo555** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:49 pm

IMHO you wont buy a sub $500 spotter that will resolve 6mm holes at 500+ yards. I tried it with a leupold 20-60 power and it was useless. I ended up selling it. Saw them better through the NF scope.
I now use my mates vortex 20-60x80 that is as good as another mates zeiss in the same power but both are worth big bucks.
I reckon u will waste 500 bucks if u buy a spotter in that range. Put the money towards a NF scope instead.
Just my two cents.
Chappo

deadkelly · Post by **deadkelly** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:42 pm

yeah i kinda thought that . i'm glad i didn't spend that $300 today

mmm well that's why i'm asking you guy's . what is everybody using ?

Brad Y · Post by **Brad Y** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:06 pm

deadkelly wrote:yeah i kinda thought that . i'm glad i didn't spend that $300 today mmm well that's why i'm asking you guy's . what is everybody using ?

Sorry had to add it in.... Im using an electronic target that tells you exactly where the bullet landed!

deadkelly · Post by **deadkelly** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:14 pm

are you on xbox or ps3 brad

.

500Nitro · Post by **500Nitro** » Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:55 am

Brad Y wrote:
deadkelly wrote:yeah i kinda thought that . i'm glad i didn't spend that $300 today mmm well that's why i'm asking you guy's . what is everybody using ?
Sorry had to add it in.... Im using an electronic target that tells you exactly where the bullet landed!

REAL SHOOTERS shoot things that bleed, the thing falls over dead when the bullet hits
so no need for electronic targets

Rinso · Post by **Rinso** » Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:16 am

I have a Vortex 20-60 Spotting scope that is excess to my needs I would take $500 plus post

cj7hawk · Post by **cj7hawk** » Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:29 am

What about a small transmitting camera that is affixed close to the target so you can watch your impacts on a small screen? 500m is a long way, but there are some that will make it OK. and you can fix a shielded loupe over a small screen for daylight use.

I bought such a sample unit while I was at SHOT show and while I haven't tried it here yet, the demonstration unit looked pretty good. I'm sure you can find one on Ebay cheap enough to use ?

Otherwise, perhaps you can use an astronomical telescopes with an erecting lens? They are pretty cheap now at Dick Smith and the likes.

Regards
David

Post by **GriMo** » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:26 pm

500Nitro wrote:
Brad Y wrote:
deadkelly wrote:yeah i kinda thought that . i'm glad i didn't spend that $300 today mmm well that's why i'm asking you guy's . what is everybody using ?
Sorry had to add it in.... Im using an electronic target that tells you exactly where the bullet landed!

REAL SHOOTERS shoot things that bleed, the thing falls over dead when the bullet hits
so no need for electronic targets

I suspect you mean hunters?

juzz338 · Post by **juzz338** » Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:59 pm

used to have a yukon that cost 380 landed that would resolve 223 holes at 500 regularly but just like the big boys yes eventually conditions dictate that no spotting scope will see any size hole. As chappo said though the nightforce would be a better choice for my mind. buy better quality the first time and you will not outgrow it as quickly

aam · Post by **aam** » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:30 am

juzz338 wrote:used to have a yukon that cost 380 landed that would resolve 223 holes at 500 regularly but just like the big boys yes eventually conditions dictate that no spotting scope will see any size hole. As chappo said though the nightforce would be a better choice for my mind. buy better quality the first time and you will not outgrow it as quickly

+1 What juzz338 and chappo said.

I have a Leica 20-60 spotting scope. Once mirage kicks in forget about seeing you're holes. Conditions will dictate.
Having said that. If you use shoot n C targets, you can see the splash of colour at 300m in heavy mirage no problems on 20 power.

Don't be in a rush to spend you're hard earned cash. Save the money and get something decent. You will be glad you did wait and save. This is from experience.

Peacemaker · Post by **Peacemaker** » Sun May 06, 2012 8:16 pm

Rinso wrote:I have a Vortex 20-60 Spotting scope that is excess to my needs I would take $500 plus post

Which model? Nomad, viper or viper HD?

Rinso · Post by **Rinso** » Sun May 06, 2012 9:00 pm

Peacemaker wrote:
Rinso wrote:I have a Vortex 20-60 Spotting scope that is excess to my needs I would take $500 plus post
Which model? Nomad, viper or viper HD?

Skyline

AusVarmint

spotting scopes ?

spotting scopes ?

spotting scopes ?

Re: spotting scopes ?

Re: spotting scopes ?

Re: spotting scopes ?

Re: spotting scopes ?

Re: spotting scopes ?

Re: spotting scopes ?

spotting scopes ?

Re: spotting scopes ?

Re: spotting scopes ?

Re: spotting scopes ?

Re: spotting scopes ?