Very Impressive

Talk about your Varmint Rifles and other firearms here!
Post Reply
adamjp
.270 Winchester
Posts: 1293
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:01 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 30/06
Location: Sthn NSW

Very Impressive

Post by adamjp »

Have a look at this comparison of a new Remington 700 barrel with a new Lilja barrel.

High bandwidth only.

http://www.riflebarrels.com/borescope_hi.asx
User avatar
trevort
Spud Gun
Posts: 12710
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:21 pm
Favourite Cartridge: Tater
Location: Melbourne

Re: Very Impressive

Post by trevort »

comparison? No comparison!
Con
.308 Winchester
Posts: 1515
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:10 am

Re: Very Impressive

Post by Con »

adamjp wrote:Have a look at this comparison of a new Remington 700 barrel with a new Lilja barrel.

High bandwidth only.

http://www.riflebarrels.com/borescope_hi.asx
And? Isn't the ultimate test how it shoots ... rather than what it looks like?
Cheers...
Con
User avatar
LoneRider
50 BMG
Posts: 3899
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 10:20 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 308
Location: rubyvale,Central Qld

Re: Very Impressive

Post by LoneRider »

i would have thaught the vid spoke for itself.
how could a barrel as bad as the first shoot any good ?
like the guy said,the fouling would be a major factor in its performance as well as the poorly make of it.
i know nothing,but i do know which i would choose - out of the 2
adamjp
.270 Winchester
Posts: 1293
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:01 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 30/06
Location: Sthn NSW

Re: Very Impressive

Post by adamjp »

Con wrote: And? Isn't the ultimate test how it shoots ... rather than what it looks like?
Cheers...
Con
How it shoots for the purpose. IT's about Accuracy v Cost.

1in group @ 100m is plenty good enough for a stalking rifle. I can't hold that good in a field position.

Not good enough for a long range varmiter though where I can get setup with a bipod and/or bag.

I'll be the first to admit I notice the improved accuracy and cleaning of the hand lapped barrels, but I own more factory barrels that probably look like the Remington one inside (but they have copper and powder foulding). :)
Con
.308 Winchester
Posts: 1515
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:10 am

Re: Very Impressive

Post by Con »

adamjp wrote:Not good enough for a long range varmiter though where I can get setup with a bipod and/or bag.
I'm ever so slightly concerned that my $150 Adams and Bennett will outshoot a $700 match grade barrel in my possession. But to be fair ... the A&B is eating CopperHead's where the match barrel is still running Norma factory loads for fireforming purposes. :D
Cheers...
Con
davegh2o
New Member
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:39 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 6.5x47L ai
Location: Brisbane QLD
Contact:

Re: Very Impressive

Post by davegh2o »

So that is blunt MARKETING,

In the 40's it was known as propaganda.

I've seen REM barrells that could have grown potatoes in the pock marks and divets in the barrell and for all intents and purposes SHOULD never have shot well........ But guess what, A Remington 700 VS, 14 years old grouped 3/8 inch with factory Federal GMM and 1/4 inch with Norma Diamond. I won't go into what it shot with researched hand loads as you won't believe me.

Sure, the Select Match Barrells are second to none and most of my guns have SMB Shilen's screwed on but do not judge a book by it's cover.

Food for thought

Dave
Post Reply