My turn
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:51 pm
Question for you gurus out there, is there such a thing as a body reamer that doesn't do the neck and throat ?
Yes ... not liked though because every reamer run in after can compound errors ... if you get what I mean. When the G&G crew were doing their compact wildcats like the 270Hog etc... I think that Dave Stendall was using a body reamer then following up with whatever neck/throat size was required.Camel wrote:Question for you gurus out there, is there such a thing as a body reamer that doesn't do the neck and throat ?
And to his credit, he had neck/throaters in about 0.002" diameter differences across many calibers allowing almost infinite choices.trevort wrote:
No matter what his reputation became, Clancy did very good work and he used separate reamers a lot,
It can be done and done well
Con wrote:Yes ... not liked though because every reamer run in after can compound errors ... if you get what I mean. When the G&G crew were doing their compact wildcats like the 270Hog etc... I think that Dave Stendall was using a body reamer then following up with whatever neck/throat size was required.Camel wrote:Question for you gurus out there, is there such a thing as a body reamer that doesn't do the neck and throat ?
In a sense a 6x45 made by running the 223Rem reamer in, followed by the 6mm neck/throater achieves the same result. So body reamers aren't popular as on its own, its useless.
Cheers...
Con