Hypothetical re chamber job

Gunsmithing & DIY forum for everyone. Enjoy!
Post your projects, questions and advice here.
Post Reply
User avatar
mick_762
50 BMG
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:46 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 308 Norma
Location: Wodonga Vic

Hypothetical re chamber job

Post by mick_762 »

So say I had a 300 win bag and wanted to make a classic . . .

Would running a .308 Norma Mag reamer up its clanger clean up the entire chamber, or better to cut 1" or so off the chamber and start again?
User avatar
Camel
Ultimate AusVarminter
Posts: 12084
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 8:51 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 20-222 6x47 rem, 250
Location: Northern Riverina NSW

Re: Hypothetical re chamber job

Post by Camel »

you would have to cut and then re cut the chamber, the winbag is a bit longer in the body and shorter in the neck.
User avatar
mick_762
50 BMG
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:46 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 308 Norma
Location: Wodonga Vic

Re: Hypothetical re chamber job

Post by mick_762 »

That is what I had surmised, but never hurts to get another opinion.

Cheers Camel.
User avatar
Glenn
375 Cheytac
Posts: 1433
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:14 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 300WM
Location: Victoria

Re: Hypothetical re chamber job

Post by Glenn »

mick_762 wrote:So say I had a 300 win bag and wanted to make a classic . . .

Would running a .308 Norma Mag reamer up its clanger clean up the entire chamber, or better to cut 1" or so off the chamber and start again?
Why??

Your going backwards!

Brass?

Glenn
Con
.308 Winchester
Posts: 1515
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:10 am

Re: Hypothetical re chamber job

Post by Con »

You'll certainly need to shunt the barrel for a clean re-chamber.

The only 'classic' 30s are the Weatherby and H&H. :lol: The Win Bag is a damn fine cartridge, feed it 200gr AccuBonds and you could virtually hunt the World.
Cheers...
CON
User avatar
mick_762
50 BMG
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:46 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 308 Norma
Location: Wodonga Vic

Re: Hypothetical re chamber job

Post by mick_762 »

Going backwards???
Maybe only by 100 fps, never known an animal that could tell the difference, .338 brass is easy to come by and the correct size, just one pass through a FLS die.

And mainly because like Torana's 20 odd years ago - every f#ckers got a Winbag and I like to be different sometimes.

Maybe if I said a .30-338 then it would be more acceptable? ??
They are basically the same cartridge.
kickinback
50 BMG
Posts: 3991
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:54 am
Favourite Cartridge: 260 Rem
Location: Lilydale Vic

Re: Hypothetical re chamber job

Post by kickinback »

Just neck the 338 brass down a extra 16 thou.........
User avatar
aaronraad
.17 HMR
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:19 am
Favourite Cartridge: Solid head brass :)
Location: Qld
Contact:

Re: Hypothetical re chamber job

Post by aaronraad »

If you're talking classic think about the 300 H&H Mag.

My money would be on the 8x68mm S cases necked down to a 30cal with a long neck. Apparently the 8x68mm RWS brass is excellent and by design the walls are quite thick to support the slightly rebated head. Wiki quotes some very high pressures (>72,000 psi) but doesn't comment how many reloads they achieve after that (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8%C3%9768mm_S) :?: :shock:

Here are a few wildcats I found on the 8x68mm S case:
  1. .30x68
  2. .30cal Boo Boo
  3. .30 HV
  4. .30 Kovacs
  5. .300 Styria Magnum
Post Reply