Page 1 of 1
For Trev
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 12:28 am
by dashooter

22-250 vs 6.5-300Wby

Family portrait with adopted son.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: For Trev
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:10 am
by macca
Look at all those radial shoulders. So very cool. God they do make the 22-250 look like a baby.
Mate that collection brings back a lot of memories for me of my early shooting life, dominated by weatherby rifles.
Cheers
Re: For Trev
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:51 am
by trevort
Thanks! Doesn't look the least bit overbore
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: For Trev
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:13 am
by dashooter
trevort wrote: ↑Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:51 am
Thanks! Doesn't look the least bit overbore
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not even close.

Re: For Trev
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:14 am
by dashooter
macca wrote: ↑Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:10 am
Look at all those radial shoulders. So very cool. God they do make the 22-250 look like a baby.
Mate that collection brings back a lot of memories for me of my early shooting life, dominated by weatherby rifles.
Cheers
I was gunna put a hornet in for comparison but it just looked silly.
Re: For Trev
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 12:47 pm
by Branxhunter
I reckon a .222 for comparison -rimless bottle neck case and all that.
What are the various chamberings in the line up?
Marcus
Re: For Trev
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 2:07 pm
by dashooter
Branxhunter wrote: ↑Sat Jun 10, 2017 12:47 pm
I reckon a .222 for comparison -rimless bottle neck case and all that.
What are the various chamberings in the line up?
Marcus
If I had a .222. Lol
Skipping the 22-250 and starting from left:
.240Wby, 257Wby, 6.5-300Wby, 7mmWby, 300Wby and 340Wby.