Page 1 of 1

Weighing brass?

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:17 pm
by flyer
Does anyone go to the extent of weighing their cases, and then using only the cases of a certain weight?

Flyer

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:39 pm
by Rinso
Flyer,
people do all sorts of things, often because they have to much time on thier hands.
Unless you are shooting Benchrest I wouldnt bother.
If your having that much trouble with accuracy that you need to batch hunting brass you should look at a few other things first.

cheers

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 9:34 pm
by flyer
I heard that benchrest guys do it. I was wondering whether it was common practice amongst the hunting/varminting community.

When one of my mates told me of the practice, I had a look at my .222 brass out of interest. I found that the variance was a lot higher than I would've previously thought.

Theoretically, it must make a difference. How that translates onto a target, well, someone might enlighten us.

Flyer.

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:30 pm
by Rinso

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:37 pm
by Knackers
G,day flyer, I'm no expert, but I've read that brass is made to a certain size and tolerance. The difference in weight between cases can be internal, ie- webbing/casewall, thicker/thinner. Therefore a case with thicker walls than another case, would have a smaller internal capacity and would then have a higher pressure spike, with the same amount of powder,which would make one shot hit a bit higher than another. If that makes any sense. :wink:

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:24 am
by GriMo
so in all practicality unless your benchresting and need that extra poofteenth of an inch its not worth your time? or did i take those articles the wrong way....

yes, i skimmed, but im usually a fairly good skimmer

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:52 am
by Rinso
GriMo,
Thats about it and the only other matter would be if the cases were rimmed in which case you dont batch by weight anyway. The weight of acase does not necesarily affect the capacity.
But I you have the time and it makes you feel better go right ahead.

cheers

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:51 pm
by flyer
So its not the weight variance thats the problem, its the case capacity that would cause an issue :?:

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:52 pm
by Rinso
Yes mate case capacity can make a difference. If you can give a clear indication of what you are trying to achieve, correct or improve then the forum can probably give you the answers you need or at least point you in the right direction.

cheers

weighing brass etc

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:41 am
by roscoe
G'day all

IMO the preparation of brass to BR standards is capable of increasing accuracy in a standard factory rifle to a less than MOA performer. Most of my rifles are 15/20 years old and have always had a diet of the best ammo I can produce. All shoot MOA or below and are stock standard as issued. Calibres 243 W, 270 W, 220 Swift, 222R and a now sold 22/250.

Good bedding, free floating barrels and the rest of the accuracy tricks are all helpful, however if you feed any rifle sub standard ammunition it will, IMO, shoot the same way.

Cheers. Roscoe

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 12:18 pm
by jb747
If you want to shoot rabbits at 400 metres, then anything that removes the flyers is helpful.

It's quite amazing how much some of the cheaper brass can vary (though if you don't want to weigh, buy Lapua, Nosler, Norma). On a small round like the 223, I've found about 30% of my 'flyers' are associated with brass that is appreciably different weight than the average. Sometimes they aren't far out of the fold, but if you are using a rifle for which the loading sweet spot is small, then it will be quite noticeable.

Of course an alternative to weighing, is to just put aside any cases that give you uncalled flyers.....