ADI 2206H

Discuss all aspects of Ammunition and Reloading here.
Post Reply
dave
7mm08 Rem
Posts: 985
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:30 pm

ADI 2206H

Post by dave »

Reloaded a mix of 50,52 & 55 gr projectiles using 2206h near max and found when cleaning the barrel was filthy? Anyone else had this problem, ive found 2208 followes closely by 2206 burns really clean but 2206h was shocking??? Any ideas?
User avatar
native hunter
.270 Winchester
Posts: 1435
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:07 pm
Favourite Cartridge: .22lr
Location: Ballina

Post by native hunter »

G"Day Dave
Im no expert but maybe its because the 2206H is a slightly slower powder and hence leaves more residue in the barrel,2206H as I understand is mainly used for smaller calibres with a smaller powder weight enabling a cleaner burn,maybe if you had to use that powder what would happen if you went to a small rifle magnum primer, would it burn cleaner.
I dont know.???
Regards
Damien Webb.
flyer
New Member
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by flyer »

Sorry Dave, I have been finding the opposite. My barrel is very clean after using 2206H.

Flyer
adrian j

Post by adrian j »

i find 2206h very dirty aswell .
jb747

Post by jb747 »

I use 2206H in 204, 223, 22/250, 6*47, 270 and 308. I don't find it any dirtier than 2206 or 2208, and it gives best accuracy and velocity in most of them.
User avatar
damien couper
17 Hornet
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:56 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 223
Location: Harrington Park NSW

Post by damien couper »

im using 2206H in my 223 and i ever had a problem it
User avatar
Jeff 8
.22 WMR
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Jeff 8 »

I used to have that problem when I used AP90 in my 44 Magnum revolver, unburnt powder everywhere. Shot accurately but I changed to 2400 and it stopped. I miss my 44.

Jeff
Gavin NZ

Post by Gavin NZ »

I brought some 2206H because I had heard it gave better velocitys than Benchmark1 in .223 with projectiles around the 50gn mark.

Not for me it didn't, pressure signs occured well under the velocity the benchmark1 can acheive.

So as I gave up on it I guess I can't comment too much on its cleanleness, except to say that I have read in many places that 2208 is known for its exceptional clean burning. I use 2208 in my faster twist .223 to drive 75gn pills
User avatar
trevort
Spud Gun
Posts: 12710
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:21 pm
Favourite Cartridge: Tater
Location: Melbourne

Post by trevort »

Its a faster burn rate than 2208.

I used it in my 204. it cleans up very easily. Cant notice any difference between 2208 in the 6/250 or 2209 in the 300 wsm in terms of ease of cleaning the barrel.
Archfile
.17 HMR
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:35 am

Post by Archfile »

I found in the 22-250 that at certain loads it was filthy beyond
belief, with slightly more pressure it was ok, and in the 6-250 its
clean as..

I think you might just want to explore a hotter or colder load, WITHIN
SAFE BOUNDS, that might resolve the issue, otherwise you might have
to either live with the filth (which i did in the 22-250) or switch powders.

-Arch
User avatar
HiWall
Site Admin
Posts: 854
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:51 am
Favourite Cartridge: .25/06
Location: Brisbane

Post by HiWall »

I think Arch has a handle on the problem from his post. I have always found that light loads with any powder burn dirtier than max loads.

If you are using the loads from a manual as your max loads, it is likely that you are well under max for your rifle. I would work up a bit hotter and see what happens.
User avatar
Drew Jaeger
.223 Remington
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:36 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 7mm-08
Location: Southern Tablelands, NSW

Post by Drew Jaeger »

No problems with AR2206H in the 204.
Post Reply