Surprising result from cheap rangefinder
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:43 pm
A dealer friend of mine brought a $500 Bushnell Legend rangefinder with him on a shooting trip last weekend . Had a chance to compare side by side with a $1500 Swarovski .
Bushnell is rated to 930 yards on reflective targets and 450 on deer . Tried it on a rocky breakaway at 780 metres . No worries .
Ranged a few goats at 330 yards . All above in bright sunlight which is apparently more difficult . Worked OK at night with the spotlight too . It would easily range tree foliage and small saltbushes out to 600 yards plus . Interesting that I couldn't get a reading on a small shed at 600 where the Swaro could . I could however get a reading on the tree next to the shed but the Swaro couldn't ! More trees in the field than sheds in my hunting grounds .
Optics were surprisingly crisp for a cheap Chinese unit but didn't test in poor light . Has 6 x magnification .
Readout and aiming was easier with the Bushnell than with the Swarovski . Swaro does have a lit readout which should be easier to read in low light . Eye must be in EXACTLY the right position though or you can't read the Swaro at all .
I liked the vertical orientation of the Bushnell vs the horizontal of the Swaro too . Easier to aim with one hand .
The Bushnell seemed pretty user friendly overall with a choice of readout in yards or metres . Had a feature that cut out readings under 150 yards for use in brush . Also has scan mode for moving targets .
I'm tempted to buy one as I think it would do 95% of what I would want to do just as well as the Swaro .
Bushnell is rated to 930 yards on reflective targets and 450 on deer . Tried it on a rocky breakaway at 780 metres . No worries .
Ranged a few goats at 330 yards . All above in bright sunlight which is apparently more difficult . Worked OK at night with the spotlight too . It would easily range tree foliage and small saltbushes out to 600 yards plus . Interesting that I couldn't get a reading on a small shed at 600 where the Swaro could . I could however get a reading on the tree next to the shed but the Swaro couldn't ! More trees in the field than sheds in my hunting grounds .
Optics were surprisingly crisp for a cheap Chinese unit but didn't test in poor light . Has 6 x magnification .
Readout and aiming was easier with the Bushnell than with the Swarovski . Swaro does have a lit readout which should be easier to read in low light . Eye must be in EXACTLY the right position though or you can't read the Swaro at all .
I liked the vertical orientation of the Bushnell vs the horizontal of the Swaro too . Easier to aim with one hand .
The Bushnell seemed pretty user friendly overall with a choice of readout in yards or metres . Had a feature that cut out readings under 150 yards for use in brush . Also has scan mode for moving targets .
I'm tempted to buy one as I think it would do 95% of what I would want to do just as well as the Swaro .