slow mo rifle blow ups

[ammoandpowder]

http://www.testfakta.se/Article.aspx?a=16350

[Dr G]

Interesting how the american built rifles blew to pieces but the european and japanese (Howa?) built rifles held together.

That said all of the non american rifles moved back a bit (to a lot) in the tool blocking the barrel. The rem and the browning seemed to stay put. I would like to be able to read how they set it up because nany riflke that was not able toi dissapate energy fron moving backwards is going to put more strain on the barrel/action.

Not one rifle had the action fail or gas escape back into where your face would be.

Thanks for the link ammoandpowder. that was great

[shane]

Interesting to watch. Wish i could read what they say.

I maybe wrong but i think they obstructed the barrels about 6-8 inchs in front of the chamber. Every rifle gave a light spray of crap into the air around that point, you can see it come off the barrels. Dont know what that crap was though.

This is more of a barrel test than the action if thats what they done. Modern actions are hard to blow up due to the quality of the materials they use these days and the heat treatment they go through.

If they really want to test the actions they should load the rounds full with bullseye or some other pistol powder and a heavy projectile on top and let it go. Maybe they done this but i doubt it as there was no gas discharge from the actions.

Would still be good to know what they say, any translators?
cheers,
Shane

[glenn asher]

There's an obvious lesson here, DON'T OBSTRUCT THE BORE Any and all rifles will react negatively to bad behaviour. No matter what country it comes from, always check it before shooting, to make sure no patches, etc. are stuck in the barrel.

[Archfile]

Would still be good to know what they say, any translators?
Shane

Did you try the google translater thingy?

[Counter]

I tried a few free online translators with little luck. Below is a (badly formatted) translation through an online service we use at work. Usually they are pretty good, but I think all the technical terms has got it beat. Anyway, if anyone is interested:

Sees films from sprängtesterna

Here, you can see how the the different elk rebounds coped with sprängtestet. The process was filmed with a mound speed camera (4000 pictures per second) in order to can to assess splitter and sprängverkan. Six of the weapons coped with the test with only a smaller buckle, while two of the weapons exploded and splitter from both stock and hole was disseminated. The risk that the shot is damaged seriouslily if the hole is blasted stands clear. Clicks on play-knapparna below in order to see a filmsekvens from each sprängtest.

Here explodes elk bouncing clean



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: Fredrik, 2007-08-30 11:03: 28
Reports

Thanks for an informative and interesting physical.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: Testfakta/Susanne Ståhl, 2007-08-27 10:50: 35
Reports

Thanks for all comments.
The test of älgstudsare has been carried out of Defense Matériel Administration (the defense's Materialverk) in Karlsborg, an of the world's in front weapon laboratories. Testfakta engages always independent and certified laboratories, specialized on different provnings or product sectors. Which laboratory
as implemented a certain test shows always of the article.
This is a full realistic test, as been carried out on equal conditions for all models. Testfaktas physicals are carried out never of game men, without of trained personnel on respective laboratorie/institutes.
When it comes to question about how the intersection grade is framräknat applies the following: The result from the precision aspects has viktats together according to the following:
Precision normalskjutning 50%
Extreme chill 25%
Varmskjutning 25%
As regards motståndet in the screw paragraph is the a difficult question and the is difficult to say about the has some importance for the result.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: Testfakta/Susanne Ståhl, 2007-08-27 10:14: 32
Reports

Thanks for your comment.
If the hole is blasted or can not without doubtly depend on differences in the hole's mist game or the steel's quality. We have not done some measurements on this.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: Mr Mike, 2007-08-27 09:19: 27
Reports

Aboutthe hole fläks up so becomes rekylen obefintlig. Therefore, the weapon does not go backward.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: Stoffe, 2007-08-27 03:51: 58
Reports

The holes' profile (Tjocklek) is safe entirelily deciding for explosion or not, and not which producer as done the hole.
The willed last interestinglily to know the holes' mist game wide the blocked point.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: ~Ace~, 2007-08-26 21:42: 58
Reports

In kits ' t know what the hell any of yall said, but Howdy!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: osand, 2007-08-26 11:32: 56
Reports

Gevärspiporna must be free - the both rotates and swells during a normally shod.
In the test, the holes are strapped in a screw anvil, although the seems to last polstrat with frigolit (?).
These relations should enough be commented on of the experts in order to the will not seem as a pc sweater test.

In my jägarutbildning:
“Sedelprovet” - the hole will last so free from framstocken that one can draw a note between them.
One sheep not amuse or to let the hole rest against some.

Grateful for clarifying.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: Martin H, 2007-08-26 01:04: 25
Reports

Haaller with. A saa called consumer side that only accepts Microsoft aer excellent daalig style. Not even the last version of Firefox clear the.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: Mr Blue, 2007-08-25 23:11: 06
Reports

Encode a side that functions irrespective of webläsare, do not steady microsofts påtvingade monopolies.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: TheOne, 2007-08-25 20:21: 11
Reports

William… The reason to that those guns that do not go broken rekylerar backward with same standard as the other depends of course self-evidentlily on the okontrollerade the waste of business no gin, has guaranteed no to do with how hard bössorna in question sat strapped.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: Andreas, 2007-08-25 10:13: 34
Reports

On those weapons where the hole is blasted tubs themselves the energy to all possible directions, therefore rekylerar the weapon not in common sense, or?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailed of: William, 2007-08-25 07:57: 01
Reports

Speculates on about all gevärd is though set equally hårt. Since a part never concerns itself backward without only says boom since exists the the that tubs themselves less backward to a lot of. The that tubs themselves a lot of why is not blasted the? Pretends motståndet that will hold gevärdet on-the-spot an arbor from jägaren? Certain is the kul to look on when the is blasted with what helps the when one not sheep all infå. =) is not jägare is not shooting crazy but but all is surely interested to say what the thinks.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Types comment
We on Testfakta.se wants to that you will can to think to about the we type and to read what other thinks. Huvudregeln is to refute all contributions with esteem.
Reads our rules as a whole here.