What calibre to change to if any, or not

Talk about your Varmint Rifles and other firearms here!

Should i change the cal or keep it as 250

Keep it as a 22.250
11
44%
Change to a .243 or
14
56%
 
Total votes: 25

prodj1000@hotmail.com

What calibre to change to if any, or not

Post by prodj1000@hotmail.com »

i currently have a rugar m77 mkII 22-250 synthetic stainless. had it about 2years and have burnt out the barrel. planning on getting a new tobler 26inch barrel for it, and thinking of changing cal to maybe a 243 or somthing that can carry a larger pill.
Or should i just keep it as a 250
Wanting good accuracy out around 300-500yrds with out going to heavy, it use to have good accuracy but now struggle to stay on A4 at 300

I dont have a lot of room to play with in the magazine and factory rounds just fit in

Open to eveyones oppinion and experiences
cheers
woob614271
17Rem
Posts: 1123
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:49 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 17Rem, 22.250AI, 308
Location: townsville qld

Post by woob614271 »

Keep it as a 22.250 (maybe go AI?) but have a 1:10 twist in the new one...
Con
.308 Winchester
Posts: 1515
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:10 am

Post by Con »

woob614271 wrote:Keep it as a 22.250 (maybe go AI?) but have a 1:10 twist in the new one...
Amen brother!!! Hot 22cal (22/250AI, SwiftAI, Clark, Middlestead), long fast twist barrel, 69gr Sierra MK. That would be my choice if I had the need for a long-range varminter.
Cheers...
Con
woob614271
17Rem
Posts: 1123
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:49 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 17Rem, 22.250AI, 308
Location: townsville qld

Post by woob614271 »

More on why I reckon on staying with a high performance 224 cal:
1. It can still run the lighter projies (50 to 60 grainers)
2. It can run the RWS 74 grain KSs for larger game (the Europeans use 'em for deer and boar)
3. The availability of brass,other projies, suitably powders, load data, dies and all the other stuff
4. It's a proven long range and accurate killer on most small and medium game.
243redmist

Post by 243redmist »

woob614271 wrote:More on why I reckon on staying with a high performance 224 cal:
1. It can still run the lighter projies (50 to 60 grainers)
2. It can run the RWS 74 grain KSs for larger game (the Europeans use 'em for deer and boar)
3. The availability of brass,other projies, suitably powders, load data, dies and all the other stuff
4. It's a proven long range and accurate killer on most small and medium game.
More on why I reckon you should change to a high performance 243 cal:
1. It can still run the lighter projies (55 to 60 grainers)
2. It can run the hornady 87 grain vmax for long distant game
3. The availability of brass,other projies, suitably powders, load data, dies and all the other stuff
4. It's a proven long range and accurate killer on most small and medium game.
User avatar
Drew Jaeger
.223 Remington
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:36 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 7mm-08
Location: Southern Tablelands, NSW

Post by Drew Jaeger »

243redmist wrote:More on why I reckon you should change to a high performance 243 cal:
1. It can still run the lighter projies (55 to 60 grainers)
2. It can run the hornady 87 grain vmax for long distant game
3. The availability of brass,other projies, suitably powders, load data, dies and all the other stuff
4. It's a proven long range and accurate killer on most small and medium game.
^ what he said. :mrgreen:
User avatar
HiWall
Site Admin
Posts: 854
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:51 am
Favourite Cartridge: .25/06
Location: Brisbane

Post by HiWall »

I dont have a lot of room to play with in the magazine and factory rounds just fit in
The answer is in your own question mate. SAAMI max coal for the .22/250 is 2.350" and for the .243 is 2.710". You won't have enough room in the magazine box unless there is a removable block in the mag or you want a single shot rifle.

If you reload I reckon the .22/250Ackley is the go. Barrel twist for whatever you want to shoot through it. One of my AI's runs 1:8 the other 1:14.
7mmmag

Post by 7mmmag »

22-250, like hiwall said, better to be able to seat the projectiles out for better accuracy than having to seat the 243 projectiles too deep.

That said, nothing wrong with the 243
User avatar
Kenny
6mm Remington
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:55 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 6mmPPC
Location: In the Doghouse

Post by Kenny »

I would go the 243 :D

As been said before...lighter pills to blow varmints apart and heavier pills for the bigger game.

I have owned both calibers but currently shoot a 243....the 250 was nice but the 6mm just seems to do it easier.

I am yet to see a 22 cal do anything more spectacular than a 6mm can...in my experience anyway

KY
prodj1000@hotmail.com

Post by prodj1000@hotmail.com »

Cheers for everbodys input,
when you guys say ackley improved, what does he actually do or change in the rifle?
ogre6br
300 Win Mag
Posts: 1781
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:35 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 6.5x55 or 6BR
Location: Melbourne Vic

Post by ogre6br »

why not get a 6/250 AI and you have all the good bits of the AI case and all the good bits of the 6mm bore diameter
and you shouldn't have any magazine length issues?

even if you go for a standard 22/250 again get tobler to take out the mag block if there is one so you can use all you case capacity by seating your projectiles long

later
p
woob614271
17Rem
Posts: 1123
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:49 pm
Favourite Cartridge: 17Rem, 22.250AI, 308
Location: townsville qld

Post by woob614271 »

AI, or ackley Improved is a means f (supposedly) getting better performance out of a cartridge by making it (and the chamber, of course) more parallel sided; ie. less taper in the body of the case; and witha steeper/sharper angle on the shoulder. It supposedly gives longer case life, easier extraction, and greater velocity with a slight increase in the amount of powder used.
People have been arguing the pros and cons ever since P O Ackley came up with the idea, along with others, way back in the 1930s-40s.
bushchook
.223 Remington
Posts: 420
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:23 pm
Favourite Cartridge: .220 Swift
Location: Wheatbelt W.A.

Post by bushchook »

Will be a simple matter to convert the .22/250 magazine to .243 if changes are necessary . Frankly I doubt that any will be required as the 2 cartridges are quite similar in length and unlikely that the .22/250 would need a magazine block to feed in .243/.308 length magazines.
Never owned a Ruger but know that action will handle .220 Swift without problems. Swift case is longer than .243 .
.243 does everything the .22/250 does and more . Have had both and 2 Swifts. .22/250 would be my last choice out of the 3 .
User avatar
Ned Kelly
.270 Winchester
Posts: 1277
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:39 am
Favourite Cartridge: 6PPC
Location: Macedon Ranges Vic

Post by Ned Kelly »

G'day all,
you could consider the 6XC which is a blown out 22-250 that looks like a shortened 243. Case it just over 2" long. Used by D Tubb to win some long range stuff in the US..........

Cheerio Ned
Sam Walker
.222 Remington
Posts: 360
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 9:13 am
Location: The Awesome NT

Post by Sam Walker »

how about the Lapua 6x47 ?
Post Reply