9BJXvFBpsQE
Here's the link to the video if it doesn't work http://youtu.be/9BJXvFBpsQE

Trav, while I had the tikka apart I was curious about the headspace in regard to the torque used to tighten the barrel. The difference between 40ft/lbs and 150ft/lbs is less than a thou in headspace.Dr G wrote:how do they ensure headspace if the barrel is only hand tightend. Do they use match marks?
Be interested to see how you go with the collapsable stock, I didnt think they were legal here. I could be wrong though
Still an interesting looking rifle
Hand tight is all it is. Apparently (I haven't seen it myself) they have made a cut into the bottom of the tennon thread area and the 4mm bolt pinches everthing togeather, if you follow my drift; a proven design from the PSR sniper contract (US military) and barrel change repeatibility is reported to be excellent.Dr G wrote:how do they ensure headspace if the barrel is only hand tightend.
I will be getting the non-folding standard variety. Folding stocks are legal in QLD if >= 75cm folded. However almost impossible to get through customs. This rifle can be retrofitted with the hinhe but I couldn't be bothered.Dr G wrote:Be interested to see how you go with the collapsable stock, I didnt think they were legal here.
Splitting hairs difference, but I think the 260R has the edge particularly on the platform I'm running.big G wrote:Mulga.
Thinking of building a 6.5x 47 Lapua .is there much difference between it and your 260'rem.?
Cheers George