
Regards Chris.
I'm all ears too.chris.tyne wrote:Pete when you talk I listen,if you are happy to type it I am more than willing to read it.....................continue the story please.
Regards Chris.
I read Leeroy`s action build on AHN and was enthralled so Pete can you please add your experience.chris.tyne wrote:Pete when you talk I listen,if you are happy to type it I am more than willing to read it.....................continue the story please.
Regards Chris.
Thanks for the story Pete. Interesting about the action rigidity that many people think is absolutely essential for accuracy. Yes it helps , but not totally essential. Many other factors affect rifle accuracy.petevm wrote:Part 2.
..........
Throughout these times I have continued to build a great many rifles on Rem actions and at one stage I got to be curious about action stiffness. So I assemled a benchrest rifle using a converted 700 short action (aluminium single shot feed tray super-glued in place). The action was bedded (not glued) into the stock and retained with the usual three screws one sees on the 'ADL' versions. Next, the barrel was pulled from a sleeved 40X 6mmPPC B/R rifle and fitted to the test rifle. The barrel was a known shooter so would provide a valid test. To my surprise the damn thing shot every bit as good as it had ever done!! Subsequently I have built a number of 'F' class rifles the same way and they give nothing away to those I have built using custom single shot actions (glued-in or otherwise). Interesting stuff that myth's are made from!! More another day, if you want it.
Pete
m12vlp wrote:Wow. I was surprised when I read the part about shortening the receiver but then the reason for it was well explained.
Thanks for that.
I know that a.JR has an action that can take the high pressure and I don't expect him to comment on it but it would be interesting to know if his and your extreme pressure actions share similar design features.